We predict outcomes and help you act on them.
Hunter-Seeker finds the risks and opportunities you care about and drafts up the precise action needed for each situation. Every decision is validated and auditable.
or book a demo
Sample run · public IBM Telco dataset
Someone opens a list every morning.
Who do we work next, why them, and can I defend that choice?
An approved action landing in the system of record, stamped with the run that produced it.
The engine posts findings as it clears them.
Hunter-Seeker tracks model performance and recalibrates when drift is detected.
A scheduled cycle announcing its own drift, with nobody watching.
Built for the queues where being wrong is expensive.
Work the accounts most likely to pay — and defend the order.
Rank by propensity, take an approved logged action, and hand the auditor the lineage they were going to ask for anyway.
Refer what needs referring. Clear the rest, with reasons.
A review queue with a human at the gate, precision on the referral set, and a reason per decision a regulator can read.
Know which accounts are about to churn — or that none are.
Top-decile lift with drivers a CSM will actually act on, and an honest empty when the quarter is quiet.
Actions land in Slack, Gmail and your CRM.
Datasets arrive from the warehouse or a CSV. Every action is logged where the operator already works.
Plus Salesforce, Slack, Pipedrive, Snowflake, Redshift and Postgres — and any CSV.
The answer is sometimes no. You get the whole analysis anyway.
A refusal is a completed analysis with a verdict. You see what was tested, how it was validated, what leak-guard pulled, and what would most likely change the answer. The run then goes back on your quota.
More outcome history, a cleaner outcome column, or the two quarantined columns replaced with pre-outcome equivalents.
The refusal, posted where the wins normally get announced.
Export the audit record in one click.
Every run carries its own audit record — what was validated, what was excluded and why, who approved the action, and the pin that lets anyone reproduce it. Shaped for SR 26-2 model-risk and EU AI Act documentation, generated whether or not anyone asks.
The attached record covers every decision in this run — what was validated, what was excluded and why, who approved the action, and the pin that reproduces it. Generated on every run, whether or not anyone asks.
| engine pin | 0.2.2 · core 4d24e9fc… |
| validation | out-of-time holdout · calibrated 1.01 |
| top-decile lift | 2.96× · clears the 1.50× bar |
| quarantined columns | 2 · listed with reasons |
| approver | d.reyes · 09:14 · recorded |
| replay | reproduces this file byte-for-byte |
| bundle | sha256 9f21c4… |
Shaped for SR 26-2 model-risk documentation and EU AI Act review.
JSON governance-3b3dc851.json84 KB · sha256 verifiedGenerated on every run and delivered to whoever needs it.
Hunter-Seeker Vs Fable 5 Vs Tuned GBM
We gave Fable 5, a gradient-boosted model Fable 5 trained for itself, and Hunter-Seeker the same telecom spreadsheet and asked each to rank who would cancel. All three flagged the same customer first. Only one could say why — and a fresh-context verifier re-derived every number below from artifacts alone.